Getting things right is the goal. Getting things wrong sometimes is reality. This page sets out what CasinoLuck does when a factual error makes it into published content – how we find errors, how we fix them, how we flag the fix to readers, and how anyone outside the team can report something that looks wrong.
Our corrections policy works alongside our fact-checking policy and editorial guidelines. Fact-checking is what we do before publication; this page is about what we do afterwards, when the information on a published page no longer matches reality.
Why We Have a Corrections Policy
Online casino content ages fast. Bonus terms get rewritten, licences get suspended, RTP figures move between game builds, payment methods come and go, and regulators change the rules. Even a review that was fully accurate on the day it went live can drift out of date in weeks. A corrections policy only works if it’s honest about that reality, so ours is built around the assumption that things will change – and that our job is to catch the drift quickly and fix it cleanly.
What Counts as a Correction
Not every edit to a published page is a correction. We draw a clear line between the two so readers know what they’re looking at.
Material Corrections
A material correction is any change that moves the substance of a review, a figure, or a recommendation. Examples include:
- A factual error about a licence, regulator, or jurisdiction
- An incorrect RTP, house edge, or bonus wagering figure
- A misattributed quote or source
- A claim about payment methods, processing times, or withdrawal limits that no longer matches reality
- A rating change driven by new information rather than a scheduled review
Material corrections are always disclosed. The page carries a revision date, and where the change is significant enough to affect what a reader would take from the page, we note what was corrected.
Routine Updates
A routine update is a change that reflects normal refresh activity rather than the correction of an error. Examples include:
- Refreshing a bonus offer when the operator launches a new one
- Adding a new payment method the operator has introduced
- Updating screenshots to match a new site design
- Adjusting a rating at a scheduled review cycle based on updated testing
Routine updates get a revision date but don’t carry a correction note, because there was no error – the underlying facts changed, and the content changed with them.
Minor Edits
Typos, grammar fixes, and small wording tweaks that don’t change the meaning of a sentence are corrected silently. A missing comma is not an editorial issue, and treating it as one would bury the corrections that genuinely matter.
How We Find Errors
Errors reach us through three channels.
Our Own Review Cycles
Every piece of CasinoLuck content is revisited on a schedule. Casino reviews are checked at least annually, and flagship guides are reviewed more often because the information behind them changes faster. A review cycle is where most outdated facts get caught – a licence that’s been suspended since the last check, a bonus that’s been retired, an RTP that’s been reissued at a different tier.
Reader, Operator, and Regulator Reports
Anyone can report a claim that looks wrong through our contact page. Readers flagging an outdated figure, operators pointing to a changed T&C, and regulators noting a compliance issue all reach us the same way, and we investigate every credible report against the relevant primary source.
Industry and Regulatory Changes
When a regulator announces a major change – a licence suspension, a new market opening, a rule update – our team identifies the content that’s affected and works through it systematically. These kinds of events can trigger corrections across dozens of pages at once.
How We Handle a Correction
When a correction is confirmed, the process is the same regardless of who reported it.
- Verify against a primary source. We don’t make corrections on the basis of a claim alone. The reporter’s information has to hold up against the regulator register, the operator’s T&Cs, the studio paytable, or another authoritative source.
- Update the content. The affected text, figure, table, or rating is changed to match the verified information.
- Add a revision date. The page carries a revision date that reflects the correction.
- Note the correction where material. For significant corrections, we add a brief note explaining what was changed and when.
- Cascade the change. If the corrected fact appears in other pages across the site, we update those too rather than leaving stale data in adjacent guides.
What We Don’t Do
We Don’t Silently Rewrite Reviews
If a CasinoLuck rating has moved materially in one direction or the other, the page says so. We don’t quietly edit old conclusions to match new ones. A review that was positive two years ago and negative today has a revision history that reflects both – not a clean surface that hides the change.
We Don’t Delete Content to Hide Errors
If a page carries a significant error, we correct the error. We don’t delete the page to make the problem disappear. The exception is pages that are no longer relevant because the operator has closed, the market has changed, or the topic has been superseded – and those are retired transparently rather than silently.
We Don’t Take Corrections on Operator Demand Alone
Operators can report errors like anyone else, and we investigate every report. But a request for a correction has to be backed by the same kind of primary source we’d require from any other reporter. A marketing-team email asking us to soften a review isn’t evidence; a link to the updated terms of service is.
How to Report an Error
If you’ve found a claim in a CasinoLuck guide that doesn’t match the primary source, we want to know. The contact page is the route for corrections, tips, and queries about specific claims. A useful report includes:
- The page URL
- The specific claim you’re flagging
- The primary source that contradicts it – a regulator register, a terms page, a studio paytable, or similar
Reports with primary-source backing move through the process faster because the verification step is already done. Reports without a source still get investigated, but we have to find the verification ourselves before we can act.
Accountability
Our corrections policy is only worth something if readers can hold us to it. Every correction is dated, significant ones are noted on the page, and the revision history is preserved rather than overwritten. If you think a correction should have been made and wasn’t, or a correction was made and wasn’t disclosed properly, tell us – the contact page is open for that feedback too.
Related pages
[bw_author_card author_id=”14″ role=”fact-checker”]
Quick reference
| Topic | Summary |
|---|---|
| Rating method | Seven-Layer Casino / Six-Criterion Sport |
| Review pattern | Pattern A (funded) or Pattern B (honest no-funded) |
| Fact-checker | Ernest Bowes , every page |
| Last review | June 2026 |
